agenda

From: billm@MCI.NET
Date: Mon Nov 16 1998 - 12:41:03 MST


hi again, Ingrid,

I'd really like to help put on a BoF for the next IETF. I got your
proposed agenda and would only like to add something about content routing,
which could include the stuff I am doing, and WCCP, (which in a new
version will be submitted shortly, according to James Aviani of Cisco). If
possible, I and some other people would like to include an informational
draft about content routing and network architecture.

Duane also said that at the BoF Keith Moore had a lot of interest in
wholesale Web replication technology. Don't really know what this means.

My talk is to be found at <http://www.nanog.org/mtg-9811/ppt/maggs/index.htm>

If you want to talk about this maybe tomorrow, please send me private email
with your phone number. The deadline for agenda is coming up, I guess.

Bill

At 07:14 PM 11/16/98 +0100, you wrote:
>At 11:34 16.11.98 -0500, billm@MCI.NET wrote:
>>Ingrid, are these suggestions something that will be discussed at the
>>(spring?) IETF? I noticed nothing is on the agenda for the December
>>meeting?
>
>I was hoping to make it for the Orlando IETF, but time is running out.
>Hopefully we will be able to get a spot at the agenda for this group, but as
>a BOF since there is no chair for this group at present (and a chair is
>required to be a WG). I am working on this, and may well need some help
>before things go my way
> - request BOF time with agenda
> - get Internet-Drafts out (to form basis for discussion)
> - get a charter that has a "rough" consensus
>
>> And are you hosting the Summer IETF yourself?
>
>Yes, I am :-)
> with a little help from my coworkers
>
>> I just gave a talk on caching from
>>the backbone perspective at NANOG in Atlanta. A lot of it was the routed
>>approach I've written about and how it fits into both proxy-based and
>>transparent mechanisms. I think they can all coexist happily.
>
>Is the presentation available?
>There is too little documentation on transparency issues yet. A discussion
>on pros and cons, taking into account both sides would be helpful.
>
>>In general, I'm quite interested in participating in a WG on content
>>replication (not just web?) . I talked to Duane Wessels for a while at
>>NANOG and he encouraged me to do more. Please tell me what's going on and
>>how I might help, organizationaly or otherwise.
>
>I just love offers like yours!
>
>Things needed
> - balanced documentation on transparency issues
> - charter for the group (hopefully something based on the list of documents
>I sent out)
> - review of documents, comments and discussion on the list
>... and probably more stuff that I do not see yet
>
>Ingrid
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:25 MST