> From joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com Thu Jul 22 13:16:01 1999
> Delivery-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 13:16:01 -0700
> Return-Path: joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com
> From: "Josh Cohen (Exchange)" <joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
> To: "'Joe Touch'" <touch@ISI.EDU>,
> "Josh Cohen (Exchange)"
> <joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
> Cc: jad@pimlico.hpl.hp.com, wrec@cs.utk.edu
> Subject: RE: 45th IETF WREC WG minutes
> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 13:13:15 -0700
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@ISI.EDU]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 12:58 PM
> > To: touch@ISI.EDU; joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com
> > Cc: jad@pimlico.hpl.hp.com; wrec@cs.utk.edu
> > Subject: RE: 45th IETF WREC WG minutes
> >
> > For a draft to be standards track, doesn't it have to be
> > the output of an IETF WG, rather than the result of an
> > independent group?
> >
> No, actually. An individual submission can be moved
> along standards track to proposed. Its not common, but it
> does happen.
> Keith/Patrick can correct me if Im mistaken.
But that would be outside of WREC; for WREC to suggest
it as proposed, we'd have to do a little more work
on it directly, no?
Joe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:26 MST