If you dont think that wrec should be producing any drafts
or recommending that existing (pre-wrec) protocol drafts
should be adopted as wg products, that's fine.
WPAD is not the only draft in this situation, I would
expect that others, such as WCCP would be treated in the same way.
Assuming that this is your (the iesg) position, then
I ask you to tell me what steps I need to take to
move WPAD to Proposed, as an "individual" submission.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 11:51 AM
> To: Ian King
> Cc: 'Keith Moore'; 'John Martin'; Joe Touch; Josh Cohen (Exchange);
> wrec@cs.utk.edu
> Subject: Re: WPAD and WREC
>
>
> > do you disagree?
>
> in this case I want WREC to stick very closely to its assigned task.
> the group is controversial enough as it is, and the ADs have already
> heard complaints about it deviating from its charter.
>
> Keith
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:26 MST