> If the folks responsible for creating wpad (and implementing it in an
> installed base such as msie) are willing to a] openly define it for
> interoperability in other clients, and b] open the protocol for future
> modification and open community review then it'd be a disgrace to push
> them down a 'closed but publicly published' informational route when
> their work is so germane to the wg and they are willing to be part of
> the process.
just because something is widely deployed doesn't mean it should be
standardized.
Keith
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:26 MST