Re: transparent proxies - the hot topic

From: Chuck Neerdaels (chuckn@inktomi.com)
Date: Tue Aug 03 1999 - 15:05:52 MDT


Maybe we should differentiate "transparent proxy" and "transparent
redirection to a proxy cache." Whether it's correct or not, when most people say
the first, they mean the latter.

chuck

Bertold Kolics wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I took a closer look at RFC2616. There one can read the following:
>
> 'A "transparent proxy" is a proxy that does not modify the request or
> response beyond what is required for proxy authentication and
> identification. [...] Except where either transparent or non-transparent
> behavior is explicitly stated, the HTTP proxy requirements apply to both
> types of proxies.'
>
> My question is: can we call a proxy transparent if it is unable to handle
> a request because it does not implement a method present in the request
> header?
>
> IMO, the transparent proxy has everything it has to know about a request:
> the port and IP address of the origin server. Nothing else is needed.
>
> Bertold



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:26 MST