>
> * surrogate proxy (reverse, server-side etc.)
>
> Probably I'm alone here, but I don't like defining "surrogate proxy"
> (or other equivalent term) at all. Otherwise we should define
> both "server-side proxy" and "client-side proxy" as special cases (?)
> of a "general proxy". Can each proxy be described as either
> server-side or client-side ? OK, I don't want to start another
> discussion on this here. However, the distinction here seems
> so unimportant to me, that I'd rather see as 2nd derivative
> if at all. I hope no other terminology bases on these terms ?
>
Sorry, after second thought I believe it would fit
into the Topology section better, since these terms
are in fact only topology relative.
--w
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:27 MST