Re: Comments please (draft-02f)

From: Alex Rousskov (rousskov@ircache.net)
Date: Wed Oct 20 1999 - 15:12:46 MDT


On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Gary Tomlinson wrote:

> Correct if I'm wrong, but isn't a technical report that is archived
> properly suitable as a RFC reference? If so, then Alex all that is
> needed would be to create a TR out of your current spec and place it
> in one of your archives at NLANR.

This was long time ago, and the taxonomy draft has a reference to our
specs at http://squid.nlanr.net/CacheDigest/cache-digest-v5.txt.

I just was under (perhaps false) impression that the editor finds it
annoying that no Cache Digest RFC has been submitted to IETF. So I
tried to explain the reasons why that was not done.

Thanks,

Alex.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:27 MST