Joe Touch wrote:
> Then we're back to defining 'application' as before :-)
I'd say definition of 'application' is a non-issue.
Is there anyone who can find a ambiguous interpretation of "client
application" the context (and audience) of wrec-taxonomy?
As you said before, it can be expected that the audience of
wrec-taxonomy has some basic knowledge of the terms used.
-- Henrik Nordstrom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:27 MST