Re: WREC/CDNP/extproxy ... moving forward

From: Michael Condry (Michael.Condry@eng.sun.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 10:49:40 MDT


> X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
> To: Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>
> cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Ian Cooper <icooper@equinix.com>, LOVRIC
Ivan FTRD/DMI/CAE <ivan.lovric@rd.francetelecom.fr>, wrec@cs.utk.edu
> Subject: Re: WREC/CDNP/extproxy ... moving forward
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wrec-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
>
> > now every player on the Internet has some kind of responsibility to the
> > consumer or the content-provider.
>
> right, but at some point that responsibility is so distant that it
> is no help in fixing things when they don't work.

I am not sure I agree. That is the way things work today.
This is the additional architecture we need to add.
 
>
> or to put it another way, we should design the system in such a way that
> (at least, for components that conform to the specification)
> the behavior of intermedaries is specified by the end-users of the system
> (meaning both providers and consumers) and such intermediaries can
> be circumvented when the need arieses.
>
> Keith



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:29 MST