> I think this is more of an issue for Extensible Proxies than the
> others.
>
> I'm in complete agreement on the fault isolation issue. For other
> things, while roles and responsibilities are ultimately important, binding
> agreements on paper are perfectly acceptable (i.e., they do not
> have to have an on-the-wire format).
I agree with this sentiment. I'm not trying to insist that the details
of such agreements be made a part of the protocol (though it would be
nice if we could do it, I suspect it would take a long time before we
could find a good way to encode the needs of real users into a protocol)
Keith
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:29 MST