Ian Cooper wrote:
>
> Here are the minutes for the WREC meeting held in San Diego. If you spot
> something that you believe is not accurate please let me know ASAP, so that
> corrections can be made before I submit the final minutes. Thanks.
...
> In order to close WREC the outstanding work items (Known Problems and
> Taxonomy documents) needed to be finished or removed. Removal and a change
> to individual submissions was the chairs favored solutions in order to
> facilitate the move to new work.
In summary, over two years of IETF WG meetings of WREC have
resulted in exactly zero WG documents?
If that's the case, i.e., if WREC has no official output,
why is it so clear that there should be a follow-on WG?
So far, I see lots of energy in a lot of directions, which
reminds me of herding cats. What is the focal point of the
new WG, and the proposed contribution?
(and, in light of WREC's results, is it realistic??)
Joe
PS - kudos to the WREC WG chairs for getting us this far,
but it seems that we should be careful about opening another
can of worms if this one has petered out...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:21:30 MST