On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:47:21PM -0800, Dan Li wrote:
> Hi, Martin, thanks for taking it up. I'd say that on the high level, the
> requirement would be: "An invalidation protocol to provide a strong cache
> coherence mechanism while avoiding the latency penalty of validation,
> usable in proxy as well as surrogate configurations." A line taken directly
> from the WG charter.
Note that the version on the IETF Web site reflects the original
draft charter submitted, not our most recent one. We're currently
trying to get the new charter recognized.
-- Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:22:56 MST