Re: RUP scope - invalidation or generalized metadata

From: Alex French (afrench@vianetworks.com)
Date: Wed Aug 08 2001 - 06:41:15 MDT


At 12:22 08/08/2001, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>In other words, it was felt that the design of RUP should be
>separated into 'distribution' and 'payload' components, with one
>payload (invalidation) defined.

I think that splitting the design into these components is a good idea; it
also helps to solve a potential issue with the draft: in the invalidation
scenario, both "push" and "pull" scenarios are covered. However, for the
other payloads (e.g. tagging for prefetch) this isn't discussed. By
separating the distribution of messages from message content, this issue
goes away.

Alex.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:22:59 MST