[Skimming to the bottom of Mike's comments]
--On Thursday, December 13, 2001 13:50 -0600 Mike Dahlin
<dahlin@cs.utexas.edu> wrote:
> So, my sense is that we should dot our i's and cross our t's for the
> current requirements document and then see if we can design a protocol
> that lives up to it.
I'd also add that if folks have protocols that are in this space they
should publish them as I-Ds so that we can all look and see what's out
there. Let's not try to start from a blank page on this ;-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:23:00 MST