At 10:53 AM 12/14/01 -0500, Patrick McManus wrote:
>I think if webi begins useful protocol work with an expectation that
>the work would be accepted you would seen engineering input in droves.
I cannot agree more. Given that we've done much RUP requirements work and
the main building block "invalidation" is well understood, I think webi
should move on to protocol design, while closing the RUP req ID. Chairs,
how about solicit interests and assemble a design/edit team?
Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 11:23:00 MST